Managed delivery teams
Governance and Changelog | The Rigors
Review the decision, evidence, boundaries, and next step for this route.
ForClients reviewing managed delivery and assessment evidence
FocusWork-first curation, named specialists, and managed delivery
ASSESSMENT RECORD
Evidence reaches a named human decision through visible controls.
- 01Instrument
- 02Scored evidence
- 03Conflict check
- 04Decision record
current v1.0 · effective July 13, 2026
Inspect current Standard v1
Review the validity plan
Every change names an owner and a reason.
A change proposal records the problem, evidence, affected roles and instruments, risk, fairness and accessibility review, privacy/security impact, commercial-independence check, current wording, migration rule, notice impact, effective date, approvers, dissent or unresolved limitation, and public explanation. The assessment governance owner controls the standard; sales, Academy, and staffing demand cannot direct a result or alter a criterion.
Every assessment record points to the exact standard and instrument versions used. A later version does not silently rescore an earlier record. If a change corrects a material defect, governance decides whether affected records require notice, correction, reassessment, suspension, or no change, and records the basis.
Editorial: meaning unchanged; logged with reviewer and date.
Clarification: interpretation narrowed or made more explicit; impact reviewed.
Material: evidence, criterion, anchor, weight, threshold, critical condition, reviewer, disposition, or applicant right changes; new version and notice required.
Emergency correction: an active safety, privacy, integrity, accessibility, or material process defect is contained immediately, then reviewed and published with scope and follow-up.
Table — scroll horizontally to review every column.
| Version | State | Effective date | Public note |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.0 | current; active | Not set | Initial inspectable scoring anatomy and calibrated specimen |
There are no prior live versions, migrations, corrections, or applicant notices.
The Rigors is modeled on the structure of ISO/IEC 17024, the international standard for bodies that certify persons. IT Modality is not accredited to it and does not claim to be.
Material public corrections and withdrawals are recorded separately so a visitor can see what changed, why, and which surfaces were affected.